|
|
NZ Cults & Religious Groups List: NCopyright © 2003-2010, Cults.co.nz
Hot picks: Narconon, Neuro-linguistic Programming (NLP), New Age Movement NName Above Every Name Inc. Nar-Anon. Narconon. Narcotics Anonymous. Narcotics Anonymous sprang from the Alcoholics Anonymous Program of the late 1940s, with meetings first emerging in the Los Angeles area of California, USA, in the early Fifties. The NA program started as a small US movement that has grown into one of the world's oldest and largest organizations of its type. ... NA's earliest self-titled pamphlet, known among members as "the White Booklet," describes Narcotics Anonymous this way: "NA is a nonprofit fellowship or society of men and women for whom drugs had become a major problem. We … meet regularly to help each other stay clean. ... We are not interested in what or how much you used ... but only in what you want to do about your problem and how we can help." Also see Nar-Anon. Do not confuse with Narconon. Necromancy. Nee, Watchman. Neo. Character in the cult movie The Matrix. The word means "new". Neuro-liguistic
Programming (NLP).
... critics argue that NLP's claims for scientific respectability are not based on the scientific method. In response, advocates of NLP argue that NLP is a pragmatic discipline, largely interested in what "works" rather than existing theory. ... critics maintain that the experimental research that does exist has been overall unsupportive of the central assumptions and core models of NLP, and that it is therefore up to the proponents to back up their models and claims of effectiveness with evidence. This is sadly similar to how Theophostic Counseling operates - the pragmatic attitude of "it works so we should do it" without bothering to figure out if it does really work (and in the case of Theophostic, if it's something that Christians should be involved with anyway). What people perceive as working is not a test of reality or scientific truth. If it works it should be scientifically testable to be shown to work. The attitude of NLP supporters that they don't need to provide rigorous scientific evidence for NLP's assumptions reminded the New Zealand Cult List editor of how the Gentle Wind Project marketed its healing instruments - GWP claimed scientific studies had been performed but when pressed for details claimed the studies had been cut short because the healing instruments obviously worked so well they didn't want to deny the control group the use of the instruments. So, does NLP work? And just what scientific evidence for NLP is there? A segment of Wikipedia's summary: ... there is a lack of empirical research or evidence to support the core aspects of NLP or the claim that NLP is an effective and rapid set of techniques for enhancing psycho-therapeutic practice, interpersonal communication and social influence. ... The experimental research that does exist was mostly done in the 1980s and 1990s, and on the whole was unsupportive of the central assumptions and core models of NLP. It consisted of laboratory experimentation testing Bandler and Grinder's hypotheses that a person's preferred sensory mode of thinking can be revealed by observing eye movement cues and sensory predicates in language use. A research review conducted by Christopher Sharpley which focused on preferred representational systems, in 1984, followed by another review in 1987 in response to a critique published by Einspruch and Forman, concluded that there was little evidence for its usefulness as an effective counseling tool. Reviewing the literature in 1988, Michael Heap also concluded that objective and fair investigations had shown no support for NLP claims about "preferred representational systems". A research committee working for United States National Research Council led by Daniel Druckman came to two conclusions. First, the committee "found little if any" evidence to support NLP's assumptions or to indicate that it is effective as a strategy for social influence. "It assumes that by tracking another's eye movements and language, an NLP trainer can shape the person's thoughts, feelings, and opinions (Dilts, 1983). There is no scientific support for these assumptions." But it's not just 1980s papers which point out the lack of scientific evidence
for NLP. Gareth Roderique-Davies, Principal Lecturer in Psychology at the University
of Glamorgan, wrote a rather interesting This paper explores what NLP is, the evidence for it, and issues related to its use. It concludes that after three decades, there is still no credible theoretical basis for NLP, researchers having failed to establish any evidence for its efficacy that is not anecdotal. And in the conclusion: ... NLP masquerades as a legitimate form of psychotherapy, makes unsubstantiated claims about how humans think and behave, purports to encourage research in a vain attempt to gain credibility, yet fails to provide evidence that it actually works. Neuro-linguistic programming is cargo cult psychology. Not all our readers agree with our Caution rating. A Christian who was involved with NLP "prior to being saved and born again" had this to say: NLP is very dangerous; seems great as most things do - a form of brain washing, and changing one's belief systems and values very subtly. Used a lot in business and motivational type programmes, and become very secular in its appeal. The One NLP guru, Dale Kirby, informs us that one of the presuppositions of NLP is "No one is wrong or broken." So why seek remedial change? On the other hand, what Mr. Kirby does have to say about NLP which is intelligible does not make it very attractive. For example, he says that according to NLP "There is no such thing as failure. There is only feedback." Was NLP invented by the U.S. Military to explain their "incomplete successes"? When the space shuttle blew up within minutes of launch, killing everyone on board, was that "only feedback"? The basic NLP tenet that "no one is wrong or broken" is not only self contradictory, but contradicts the Christian concept of sin. NLP also turns the focus of a Christian from depending on God to depending on their own efforts, abilities and attitude, in a similar way to Christian Science, Scientology and hypnotism. Our thanks to British NLP practitioner Andrew Bradbury for his help in preparing this listing, grudgingly given though it was at times. New Age Movement. New Apostolic Reformation. New Church in New Zealand. New Testament Church of God New Zealand. New Zealand Spiritual School. New Zealand Training Centre. NZ Revival Network. NZ School of Meditation. Niagara Therapy. NLP. See Neuro-linguistic Programming. Noni Juice. Nooma. Nutritionals. USANA Nutritionals is the name of a range of products by USANA Health Sciences. |
|||||||
Home | Updates
| List: A B C
D E F G
H I J K
L M N O
P Q R S
T U V W
X Y Z |
Closeups
Cult FAQ | Books
| Movies | TV/Radio
| Glossary | Census
| Search | Wanted |
Contact | About
|